In re UV Logistics, LLC, 682 S.W.3d 612 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2023, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]).

Successfully defended trial court’s decision to order that independent neuropsychological exam of the plaintiffs be audio and video recorded. The court of appeals found no abuse of discretion where there was evidence of special circumstances—cognitive deficits that could affect the plaintiffs’ ability to communicate about the testing with their counsel—that supported recording the exam.

Previous
Previous

Roe v. Tajon, No. 02-23-00179-CV, 2023 WL 8643020, at (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 14, 2023, no pet. h.).

Next
Next

Bugle Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Sheikh, No. 14-22-00470-CV, 2023 WL 7034213 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 26, 2023, no pet. h.).