Our Dallas Office

Mailing address:
P.O. Box 224626
Dallas, Texas 75222

Physical address:
2223 W Jefferson Blvd.
Dallas, Texas 75208

214.946.8000 phone
214.946.8433 fax

Our Santa Fe Office

505 Cerrillos Road, Suite A209
Santa Fe, NM 87501

505.986.0600 phone
505.986.0632 fax

Our Houston Office

2000 West Loop South, Suite 2200
Houston, Texas 77027

713.401.9901 phone
214.946.8433 fax

NEWS

Caren Friedman wins in the New Mexico Supreme Court!

Congratulations to DP&S partner, Caren Friedman, who prevailed before the New Mexico Supreme Court!  Caren represented individuals whose appeal was dismissed by the New Mexico Court of Appeals as untimely.  Caren successfully convinced the New Mexico Supreme Court to reinstate Plaintiffs’ appeal.  The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeals improperly gave “greater weight to procedural formalities than to basic rights of appeal” and should have deferred to the district court’s decision to grant an extension of the Plaintiffs’ notice of appeal deadline based on excusable neglect.  You can read the opinion here.

Caren Friedman is a 2020 “Super Lawyer” too!

Congratulations to DP&S’s Santa Fe Partner, Caren Friedman, who was named a Southwest (New Mexico and Arizona) “Super Lawyer” in the Appellate category for 2020.  This is Caren’s 14th year to be included on this list, and she is one of only five New Mexico attorneys to be included in the Appellate category.

Caren Friedman wins in the New Mexico Court of Appeals!

Congratulations to DP&S’s New Mexico partner, Caren Friedman, on her victory in the New Mexico Court of Appeals in a domestic relations appeal.  The Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the district court’s method of calculating the community’s interest in Husband’s retirement benefits and valuing Wife’s share.  The Court of Appeals also affirmed the district court’s refusal to allow Wife’s late-disclosed expert to testify, where Wife offered her expert report months after the evidentiary hearing.  You can read the court’s opinion here.

Congratulations to our 2020 Texas “Super Lawyers”!

DP&S is pleased to announce that, once again, its Dallas partners Kirk Pittard, Leighton Durham, Thad Spalding, and Rick Thompson have been named “Super Lawyers” in the Appellate category by Super Lawyers Magazine, a Thomson Reuters publication, for 2020.  Kirk was also named, once again, to the “Top 100” list for Dallas/Fort Worth and–for the first time–to the “Top 100” in Texas.

Dana Levy wins in the Dallas Court of Appeals!

Congratulations to Dana Levy who successfully convinced the Dallas Court of Appeals to reinstate a medical malpractice case that had been dismissed.  On appeal, Dana convinced the court that a cardiologist with hospital administration experience was qualified to opine as to a hospital’s policies and procedures for providing cardiac care.  You can read Dana’s briefing here, and the Court of Appeals’ opinion here.

Tammy Holt wins in the San Antonio Court of Appeals!

Congratulations to Tammy Holt and trial counsel, Rey Perez, who won an appeal in the San Antonio Court of Appeals this week.  The interlocutory appeal was filed by a private entity who contracted with a governmental entity to manage a nursing home.  Claiming derivative sovereign immunity, the private entity tried to claim that it could not be sued because, by contracting with the government, it was entitled to the same immunity from suit the government enjoys.  The trial court declined to dismiss the case.  The private entity appealed and, without reaching the substance of the derivative sovereign immunity claim, the court of appeals dismissed the appeal holding that contracting with a government entity did not transform the contractor into a “governmental entity” entitled to appeal under the interlocutory appeal statute.  You can read Tammy’s briefing here and the court’s opinion here.

Caren Friedman argues in the New Mexico Supreme Court!

Congratulations to Santa Fe Partner, Caren Friedman, who presented argument on behalf of the Petitioners in the New Mexico Supreme Court on September 16, 2020.

The case involved the death of the Petitioners’ 20-year-old daughter when the airbag system in her Ford Ranger truck failed to deploy.  To pile tragedy upon tragedy, after years of litigation, the district court granted summary judgment to Ford Motor Company as a sanction against Petitioners’ trial counsel.  When that same trial counsel then proceeded to miss the deadline for filing an appeal, the New Mexico Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal as untimely.  Caren argued in the New Mexico Supreme Court for the reinstatement of the Petitioners’ appeal, so that their lawsuit may be decided on its merits.  You can listen to Caren’s argument here.

Kirk Pittard and Rick Thompson again named “Best Lawyers in America”!

Congratulations to Dallas partners Kirk Pittard and Rick Thompson who have been, once again, named “Best Lawyers” in the Appellate Practice category by The Best Lawyers in America for 2020.  You can see Kirk and Rick’s listing here.

Lana Beverly wins appeal in Houston’s First Court of Appeals!

Congratulations to Lana Beverly who won an appeal in front of Houston’s First Court of Appeals this week.  The case involved a facility for young people with disabilities in which the Defendants filed a second Ch. 74 motion to dismiss claiming the case was a medical malpractice case and required an expert report.  Given that this was the second time Defendants had asserted this argument, Lana successfully convinced the Court of Appeals that the law of the case, as determined the first time Defendants made this argument, controlled the case and did not allow a second attempt to claim that the case was a medical malpractice case.  You can read Lana’s briefing here and read the opinion here.

DP&S and Parker Waichman LLP help keep cancer drug suit alive!

Congratulations to firm client Parker Waichman LLP on securing a denial of a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. in a case pending in the District of New Mexico alleging that Novartis hid serious side effects of its blood cancer drug Tasigna.  Novartis argued that the plaintiff failed to allege the exact date he was diagnosed with the side effects, and thus he should not be able to move forward with his negligence and product liability claims.  U.S. District Judge James A. Parker disagreed, finding that the plaintiff was not required to preemptively refute Novartis’ affirmative defenses, and that his lawsuit can proceed.  You can read the Court’s opinion here.  You can also read a Law360.com article about the case here.

Scroll to Top